WebinarsNRRI InsightsColloquiums

Event Information:

  • Wed

    Tracking Net Neutrality - Pathways to an Open Internet

    2:00 pmWebinar

    Travis Kavulla presentation
    Sherry Lichtenberg & Kathryn Kline presentation

    Register now

    The FCC Restoring Internet Freedom Order was released in December 2017 and published in the Federal Register on February 22, 2018.  The Order redefines Broadband Internet Access Service (BIAS) as an information service, regulated under Title I of the Telecommunications Act, rescinding the Commission’s 2016 decision to oversee Internet service providers under Title II of the Act.

    Since then, 35 states have acted to protect net neutrality since the new rules were adopted.  Six states, Hawaii, Montana, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont, have addressed this change by issuing Executive Orders requiring companies wishing to contract with the State to confirm that they will meet the 2017 net neutrality requirements.   Overall, 29 states proposed legislation reinstating the net neutrality rules or requiring state contractors to abide by them.  Nine additional states initiated Resolutions supporting Net Neutrality principles.  This legislation passed in Washington and Oregon, with bills still pending in several other states.

    This webinar will provide an update on this important topic, including the types of bills that were introduced, privacy implications, FCC preemption of state laws, and other issues surrounding net neutrality.

    Jonathan Banks, Sr. VP, Law and Policy, USTA
    Rick Cimerman, Vice President, External and State Affairs, NCTA
    Timothy Karr, Sr. Director, Strategy and Communications, Free Press
    Elin Swanson Katz, President NASUCA and Consumer Counsel, Connecticut
    Hon. Travis Kavulla, Vice Chairman, Montana Public Service Commission
    Moderators:  Sherry Lichtenberg, Ph.D. & Kathryn Kline< NRRI


no event

Event Information:

  • Sat

    NRRI Colloquium

    3:00 PM MountainFairmont Scottsdale Princess, Scottsdale, AZ

    Ken Costello, Principal Researcher – Energy & Environment, NRRI
    The Challenges of Electric Power Resiliency for Decision-Makers

    The presumption among industry observers is that the resiliency of the U.S electric power sector is deficient. If industry spends additional monies on improving its resiliency, the benefits should outweigh the costs. In analyzing this common view, one needs to first define resiliency and then measure the benefit-cost ratio of enhancing it. Definitions of resiliency abound and its benefits are devoid of accurate quantification. Uncertainty of the benefits inevitably forces decision-makers to rely heavily on value judgments. It also makes strict cost-benefit tests less viable because of dubious results. Any analysis of resiliency, however defined, faces these limitations. Another challenge for decision-makers is designing a widely-used single metric for identifying a baseline level of resiliency, setting a standard, or quantifying the tradeoffs within a cost-benefit framework.

    Kathryn Kline, Senior Research Associate, NRRI
    Integrated Resource Planning: How Can We Approach Water IRPs as a Win-Win for Conservation and Efficiency?

    While Integrated Resource Planning has been a standard in the energy field for several decades, state commissions have not adapted this planning practice for wide-spread use in the water industry. Planning provides a win-win scenario where all parties benefit from deliberative process and increased regulatory certainty. How does the IRP process translate to water utilities, and how can state commission begin adopting elements of the IRP process for the benefit of consumers and utilities alike? This presentation will provide an overview of best practices for water IRPs, and provide some potential policy recommendations for states considering water IRPs for the first time.

    Dr. Sherry Lichtenberg, Principal Researcher – Telecommunications, NRRI
    State Universal Service Funds: An Update

    This presentation will review changes to state universal service funds as the federal USF moves from a “voice-centric” to a “broadband-centric” program. The presentation will address changes to state contribution methodology proposed or adopted in Maine, New Mexico, and Nebraska. It will also look at the ways in which the states are using USF funding to fill the gaps in broadband deployment